Seth J. Gillespie, PhD
Seth is a proven Information Technology Leader known for his ability to guide companies successfully through large, complex internet-scale Data Center infrastructure deployments positivity impacting millions of customers worldwide. Seth is a skilled and capable manager who cuts through ambiguity, embodies energy, delivers innovative results and fosters high levels of excellence within his teams.
- Follow Innovation in IT Management on WordPress.com
Zarrah Felton (@Felt… on The Map of Mathematics 2010 In Review | Inn… on Multi-Monitor Productivity travelswithivan on Leadership Styles marissahizzle on Silicon Valley: My Home prakashec058 on Common Project Manager Mi…
Recent Posts: Innovation in IT Management
Category Archives: GTD
This is the ground floor – the huge volume of actions and information you currently have to do and to organize, including emails, calls, memos, errands, stuff to read, stuff to file, things to talk to staff about, etc. If you got no further input in your life, this would likely take you 300-500 hours to finish. Just getting a complete and current inventory of the next actions required at this level is quite a feat.
This is the inventory of your projects – all the things that you have commitments to finish, that take more than one action step to complete. These “open loops” are what create most of your actions. These projects include anything from “look into having a birthday party for Susan” to “buy Acme Brick Co.” Most people have between 30 and 100 of these. If you were to fully and accurately define this list, it would undoubtedly generate many more and different actions than you currently have identified.
What’s your job? Driving the creation of a lot of your projects are the four to seven major areas of responsibility that you at least implicitly are going to be held accountable to have done well, at the end of some time period, by yourself if not by someone else (e.g. boss.) With a clear and current evaluation of what those areas or responsibility are, and what you are (and are not) doing about them, there are likely new projects to be created, and old ones to be eliminated.
Where is your job going? What will the role you’re in right now be looking like 12-18 months from now, based on your goals and on the directions of the changes at that level? We’ve met very few people who are doing only what they were hired to do. These days, job descriptions are moving targets. You may be personally changing what you’re doing, given personal goals; and the job itself may need to look different, given the shifting nature of the work at the departmental or divisional level. Getting this level clear always creates some new projects and actions.
The goals and direction of the larger entity within which you operate heavily influence your job and your professional direction. Where is your company going to be, one to three years from now? How will that be affecting the scope and scale of your job, your department, and your division? What external factors (like technology) are influencing the changes? How is the definition and relationship with your customers going to be changing, etc.? Thinking at this level invariably surfaces some projects that need to be defined, and new action steps to move them forward.
What is the work you are here to do on the planet, with your life? This is the ultimate bigger picture discussion. Is this the job you want? Is this the lifestyle you want? Are you operating within the context of your real values, etc.? From an organizational perspective, this is the Purpose and Vision discussion. Why does it exist? No matter how organized you may get, if you are not spending enough time with your family, your health, your spiritual life, etc., you will still have “incompletes” to deal with, make decisions about, and have projects and actions about, to get completely clear.
Download a this map here heatmap-blank
The MindMeister source file is here.
E-mail me for a MindManager .mmap file.
@agenda …to prepare for meetings and people
(p. 144, with @ symbols are referances on p. 153)
In GTD the major categories lists I found useful were:
- Next Actions
- Waiting for
It should be noted that these are hard copies to be kept in manila folders, or in some other system you may have. These lists are also refered to in the context of hard edges.
In terms of the process flow diagram presented by David Allen (p. 32) in GTD, I often think about the waiting on items under the what’s the next action, which is sorted by delegate it.
One idea I had was to capture these waiting on items in the form of a weekly report by project. I’ll give it a try and let you know how it works out.
Well, according to David Allen (p. 122) in GTD process as follows:
- Process the top item first
- Process one item at a time
- Never put anything back into “in”
So these means if you have a piece of junk mail on top of a note from the CEO to you, process the junk mail first.
Refer to the diagram in the GTD section of the blog for what the process flow, because there are further categorization that you must follow, if for example the action will take you more then 2 minutes, it’s a multi-step project, etc